A Comparison of Test Media
All materials with the exception of the modeling clay were shot with a CCI .22 LR “Stinger” from an approximate distance of six feet. The factory data has these bullets leaving the muzzle at 1640 f/s.
This is one of the most common materials used for informal bullet tests. It’s free and readily available, but a bit on the heavy side. I imagine that bringing to the range enough soaking wet paper to test even a single big game bullet would be a real chore. The bullet penetrated about 6″ into the stack of paper, but the cavity seems a bit exaggerated.
I tried this stuff over a year ago during my initial search for a suitable test material. My mother, who is an art teacher, was kind enough to donate all the modeling clay that was no longer suitable for creative purposes. I mixed in some petroleum jelly until the clay had an even and softened consistency, and packed it into a box. I fired one of my 158 grain Speer Gold Dots into it from my carbine at a range of about 20 feet. The results were simply catastrophic. The bullet blew an enormous crater in the clay and I had bits of the stuff raining down on my head for a good three seconds after the shot. Clearly, modeling clay would not do.
The Bullet Test Tube is basically a soft, sticky wax packed into a cardboard tube. After the shot, the tube is split along the length of the bullet’s path to reveal the permanent cavity and the bullet itself. I like that it takes less of this stuff to stop a bullet than the gel or wet paper, and it’s indefinitely reusable as it can be melted down and recast. Perhaps the biggest disadvantages are that it’s sticky to the touch and it adheres to anything with which it comes in contact. The initial cost is a bit high, but its reusable nature makes up for that and it does do its job well. The bullet penetrated 3.5″ into the test tube material and was recovered in a similar state to the bullets recovered from the other media.








